SOUTH CAROLINA election commission
If contact with Chris
Whitmire results in no action, Gov. Mark Sandford may be contacted
at 803 734-2100 email@example.com.
Dobbs says SOUTH CAROLINA PRIMARY IS ALREADY STOLEN
would like to get the answers to these 6 questions please:
When where the voting machines LAST certified?
Who did the certification?
Who witnessed the certification, specifically?
Have the machines been under a secure storage facility since the
Are voting machines unconstitutional?
2, Section 1 of the S.C. Constitution:
RIGHT OF SUFFRAGE
SECTION 1. Elections to be by secret
ballot; protection of right of suffrage.
All elections by the
people shall be by secret ballot, but
the ballots shall not be counted in secret.
The right of suffrage, as regulated in this Constitution, shall be
protected by laws regulating elections and prohibiting, under
adequate penalties, all undue influence from power, bribery,
tumult, or improper conduct
Will we receive a printed receipt showing how our vote was counted?
Carolina General Assembly
117th Session, 2007-2008
Microsoft Word format
Sponsors: Senator Leventis
in the Senate on January 9, 2007
Currently residing in the
Senate Committee on Judiciary
Electronic voting machines
HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE
Date Body Action Description with journal
page number ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/9/2007 Senate Introduced and read first time SJ-143 1/9/2007 Senate Referred to Committee on Judiciary SJ-143 1/17/2007 Senate Referred to Subcommittee: Martin (ch), Malloy, Campsen, Williams
View the latest legislative
the LPITS web site
OF THIS BILL
matches printed bills. Document has been reformatted to meet World
Wide Web specifications.)
AMEND SECTION 7-13-1640,
AS AMENDED, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO
VOTING MACHINE REQUIREMENTS, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT BEGINNING WITH
THE 2008 GENERAL ELECTION, ALL ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES MUST
PRINT OUT A RECEIPT SHOWING HOW THE VOTER CAST HIS VOTE THAT MUST
BE DEPOSITED IN A RECEPTACLE BY THE VOTER TO VERIFY THE VOTE TALLEY
IF THERE IS A RECOUNT.
it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:
1. Section 7-13-1640
of the 1976 Code,
as last amended by Act 103 of 1999, is further amended by adding at
Beginning with the 2008 general election, an electronic
voting machine must print out a receipt showing how the voter cast
his vote that must be deposited in a receptacle by the voter, which
only must be used to verify the vote at the polling place if there
is a recount."
2. This act takes effect upon approval by the
web page was last updated on January 18, 2007 at 3:25 PM
Who Cast the Votes Decide Nothing-
who Count the Votes decide everything"
Electronic voting machines
in Florida showed one candidate with negative
Fraud in the central
tabulator in New Hampshire?
This youtube shows the
votes, when they were first released, as a town by town tabulation.
This early release shows Ron Paul won.
THIS VIDEO AND SAVE IT. THIS IS HARD EVIDENCE.
you visit this site now, you will find that the results have been
flipped to match the central tabulator:
com/news/ politics/ 2008/nh/nh_ primary_gop_ results_by_ town/
Ron Paul - Now The Boston
Globe Changed Their Story http://www.youtube.
recorded testimony, given under oath,
Clinton Curtis who admits that he wrote the program for vote fraud:
USA Elections Exposed
is an honest count unless it is in full view of the people. NO
electronic vote counting machine does that.
on.net/news/ 2008/jan/ 07/s_c_use_ voting_machines_ banned_other_
GREENVILLE — South
Carolina election officials say they still plan to use touch-screen
voting machines despite the fact that other states have banned the
use of similar systems made by the same company.
Last month, top election
officials in Ohio and Colorado declared that Election Systems and
Software's iVotronic is unfit for elections.
The ban was prompted by a
study done for the state of Ohio in which researchers found
electronic voting systems could be corrupted with magnets or
handheld electronic devices such as Palm Treos.
reviewed the report and we remain confident in the security and
accuracy of South Carolina's voting system," state Election
Commission spokesman Chris Whitmire said.
the South Carolina League of Women Voters has renewed its call for
the state to record votes on paper as well as electronically to
allow for accuracy checks, though there have been no documented
cases of actual election tampering.
very difficult to get evidence that somebody tampered with the vote
if you have no way of knowing what the vote was before they
tampered," said Eleanor Hare, a computer scientist who
participated in a study of the machines by the South Carolina
League of Women Voters.
machines have been used statewide since 2006.
Ohio study found the machines "lack the fundamental technical
controls necessary to guarantee a trustworthy election under
vulnerabilities allow even persons with limited access —
voters and precinct poll workers — to compromise voting
machines and precinct results, and, in some cases, to inject and
spread software viruses into the central election management
system," the report says.
However, the company that
makes the machines says on its Web site that it disagrees with the
Ohio report's technical findings.
of our voting systems have been thoroughly tested and examined
under realistic election conditions before those systems are ever
made available to states for additional testing and consideration,
" the company's statement says. "The testing and
certification processes already in place are extremely rigorous,
ensuring that voting systems meet well-established standards for
performance under realistic election conditions."
--------- --------- --
You Count on Voting Machines?
com:80/2008/ 01/06/magazine/ 06Vote-t. html?ref= magazine
Fraud Against Paul Confirmed in Sutton, N.H.
admin | January 8, 2008
January 8, 2008
According to a post
this evening on
the Ron Paul Forums, vote fraud occurred in Sutton, New Hampshire:
with 100% reporting reported 0 votes for paul but poster in Sutton
My mom, aunt, and dad all voted for RP today in my
hometown, My mom and aunt both work passing out ballots, and
checking them off. I just looked at the politico map and it says
their town has ZERO votes for Ron. Now i know that there isn’t
corruption on voting in that little town, so where they reported it
must be. What do I do, anyone know???
Originally Posted by
sstjean View Post
This was posted to ronpaul-801 tonight: “This
town numbers are wrong wrong wrong on this map. I am from Sutton
originally and my parents and one aunt all voted for Ron Paul today
and Sutton says 0. So this is wrong. This is a town that had 20
people counting the ballots and I have no reason to believe that
they cheated. Small town and I was born and raised there. The real
numbers will come in by morning. The electronic machines in the big
towns are the ones we have to worry about.”
in the day, Brad
other suspicious behavior:
started tingling before going to bed last night and hearing
reports, on MSNBC, that there were 17 paper ballots cast in
Dixville Notch, NH’s midnight, first-in-the- country voting.
The report said that there were only 16 registered voters in the
tiny voting precinct, yet 17 votes had been cast — suggesting
that somehow, paper ballot “voter fraud” skullduggery
however, believes the story is easily debunked:
that one of those reports seems to have begun on The DRUDGE REPORT
earlier today, we’re not particularly surprised that the MSM
kept repeating the easily-debunked stories running all day.
That, even while there
are reasons to be concerned about how the paper ballots used in the
New Hampshire Primary will actually be counted by the hackable
Diebold optical-scan systems used in the state, as controlled and
programmed by an outrageously bad private contractor there.
course, there is plenty of room for hank-panky, as Michael
81% of New Hampshire
ballots are counted in secret by a private corporation named
Diebold Election Systems (now known as “Premier”). The
elections run on these machines are programmed by one company, LHS
Associates, based in Methuen, MA. We know nothing about the people
programming these machines, and we know even less about LHS
Associates. We know even less about the secret vote counting
software used to tabulate 81% of our ballots. People like to say
“but we use paper ballots! They can always be counted by
But they’re not.
They’re counted by Diebold. Only a candidate can request a
hand recount, and most never do so. And a rigged election can
easily become a rigged recount, as we learned in Ohio 2004, where
two election officials were convicted of rigging their recount….
In short, the stage was set
by Diebold and Republican operatives to rig yet another election,
as the above first-hand account seems to indicate.
any of these Urls do not open, use copy and paste into the
com/results? search_query= hacking+democrac y&search=Search
Democracy 1 of 9
Democracy 2 of 9
com/watch? v=Eopnvw7mh_ 8&feature=related
Democracy 3 of 9
Democracy 4 of 9
Democracy 5 of 9
Democracy 6 of 9
Democracy 7 of 9
Democracy 8 of 9
Democracy 9 of 9
Diebold Demands HBO Cancel
Film Hacking Democracy (Alex Jones report)
Anyone can be Hacking
Democracy in Florida Part 1
Anyone can be Hacking
Democracy in Florida Part 2
HBO's Hacking Democracy
the ROMs of a Nedap e-voting computer in 60 seconds
Ron Paul Votes Not Counted
In New Hampshire District
anet.com/ articles/ january2008/ 010908_not_ counted.htm
New Hampshire District
Admits Ron Paul Votes Not Counted
Sutton township reported
Congressman had zero votes, actual number was 31
anet.com/ articles/ january2008/ 010908_district_ admits.htm
Paper Prevailed, Different Results
.org/nh_machine_ vs_paper. html
99 Ways to Steal Elections:
The Story of John Fund and Ron Paul http://howtheneocon
sstolefreedom. blogspot. com/2008/ 01/99-ways- to-steal- elections-
are a is an amazing site that shows proof of fraud...
s.org/cgi- bin/forums/ discus.cgi