file:///C:/DOKUME~1/ADMINI~1/LOKALE~1/Temp/svp4c.tmp/svp81.tmp/webpreview.htm

Questions for CWhitmire@elections.sc.gov  of SOUTH CAROLINA election commission

If contact with Chris Whitmire results in no action, Gov. Mark Sandford may be contacted at 803 734-2100   mark@gov.sc. gov

 

Lou Dobbs says SOUTH CAROLINA PRIMARY IS ALREADY STOLEN

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUpN5GaOjkY

 

I would like to get the answers to these 6 questions please:

1. When where the voting machines LAST certified?

2. Who did the certification?

3. Who witnessed the certification, specifically?

4. Have the machines been under a secure storage facility since the certification?

5. Are voting machines unconstitutional?

Article 2, Section 1 of the S.C. Constitution:

http://www.scstatehouse.net/scconstitution/a02.htm

ARTICLE II.
RIGHT OF SUFFRAGE
SECTION 1. Elections to be by secret ballot; protection of right of suffrage.
All elections by the people shall be by secret ballot,
but the ballots shall not be counted in secret. The right of suffrage, as regulated in this Constitution, shall be protected by laws regulating elections and prohibiting, under adequate penalties, all undue influence from power, bribery, tumult, or improper conduct

8. Will we receive a printed receipt showing how our vote was counted?

South Carolina General Assembly
117th Session, 2007-2008

Download This Bill in Microsoft Word format

Indicates Matter Stricken
Indicates New Matter

S. 256

STATUS INFORMATION

General Bill
Sponsors: Senator Leventis
Document Path: l:\council\bills\gjk\20049sd07.doc

Introduced in the Senate on January 9, 2007
Currently residing in the Senate Committee on Judiciary

Summary: Electronic voting machines

HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS

     Date      Body   Action Description with journal
 page number  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------      1/9/2007  Senate  Introduced and read first time SJ-143      1/9/2007  Senate  Referred to Committee on Judiciary SJ-143     1/17/2007  Senate  Referred to Subcommittee: Martin (ch), Malloy, Campsen,                           Williams  

View the latest legislative information at the LPITS web site

VERSIONS OF THIS BILL

1/9/2007

(Text matches printed bills. Document has been reformatted to meet World Wide Web specifications.)

A BILL

TO AMEND SECTION 7-13-1640, AS AMENDED, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO VOTING MACHINE REQUIREMENTS, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT BEGINNING WITH THE 2008 GENERAL ELECTION, ALL ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES MUST PRINT OUT A RECEIPT SHOWING HOW THE VOTER CAST HIS VOTE THAT MUST BE DEPOSITED IN A RECEPTACLE BY THE VOTER TO VERIFY THE VOTE TALLEY IF THERE IS A RECOUNT.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:

SECTION    1.    Section 7-13-1640 of the 1976 Code, as last amended by Act 103 of 1999, is further amended by adding at the end:

"(D)    Beginning with the 2008 general election, an electronic voting machine must print out a receipt showing how the voter cast his vote that must be deposited in a receptacle by the voter, which only must be used to verify the vote at the polling place if there is a recount."

SECTION    2.    This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor.

----XX----

This web page was last updated on January 18, 2007 at 3:25 PM

"Those Who Cast the Votes Decide Nothing-

Those who Count the Votes decide everything"

Joseph Stalin

 

Electronic voting machines in Florida showed one candidate with negative votes.

Fraud in the central tabulator in New Hampshire?

This youtube shows the votes, when they were first released, as a town by town tabulation. This early release shows Ron Paul won.

DOWNLOAD THIS VIDEO AND SAVE IT. THIS IS HARD EVIDENCE.

01-09-2008 4:00 AM

http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=N8xgWjFe1cE 

If you visit this site now, you will find that the results have been flipped to match the central tabulator:

http://www.boston. com/news/ politics/ 2008/nh/nh_ primary_gop_ results_by_ town/ 

Ron Paul - Now The Boston Globe Changed Their Story http://www.youtube. com:80/watch? v=Zu0Oaw9tIPM

Here is actual recorded testimony, given under oath, 

by Clinton Curtis who admits that he wrote the program for vote fraud:

Rigged USA Elections Exposed

http://www.fliggo. com:80/video/ sk0SiTCu  

 

Nothing is an honest count unless it is in full view of the people. NO electronic vote counting machine does that.

 

http://www.charlest on.net/news/ 2008/jan/ 07/s_c_use_ voting_machines_ banned_other_ sta26854/

 

Associated Press

Monday, January 7, 2008


GREENVILLE — South Carolina election officials say they still plan to use touch-screen voting machines despite the fact that other states have banned the use of similar systems made by the same company.

Last month, top election officials in Ohio and Colorado declared that Election Systems and Software's iVotronic is unfit for elections.

The ban was prompted by a study done for the state of Ohio in which researchers found electronic voting systems could be corrupted with magnets or handheld electronic devices such as Palm Treos.

"We've reviewed the report and we remain confident in the security and accuracy of South Carolina's voting system," state Election Commission spokesman Chris Whitmire said.

But the South Carolina League of Women Voters has renewed its call for the state to record votes on paper as well as electronically to allow for accuracy checks, though there have been no documented cases of actual election tampering.

"It's very difficult to get evidence that somebody tampered with the vote if you have no way of knowing what the vote was before they tampered," said Eleanor Hare, a computer scientist who participated in a study of the machines by the South Carolina League of Women Voters.

The machines have been used statewide since 2006.

The Ohio study found the machines "lack the fundamental technical controls necessary to guarantee a trustworthy election under operational conditions."

"Exploitable vulnerabilities allow even persons with limited access — voters and precinct poll workers — to compromise voting machines and precinct results, and, in some cases, to inject and spread software viruses into the central election management system," the report says.

However, the company that makes the machines says on its Web site that it disagrees with the Ohio report's technical findings.

"All of our voting systems have been thoroughly tested and examined under realistic election conditions before those systems are ever made available to states for additional testing and consideration, " the company's statement says. "The testing and certification processes already in place are extremely rigorous, ensuring that voting systems meet well-established standards for performance under realistic election conditions."

------------ --------- --------- --

Can You Count on Voting Machines?

http://www.nytimes. com:80/2008/ 01/06/magazine/ 06Vote-t. html?ref= magazine 

------------ -

Voter Fraud Against Paul Confirmed in Sutton, N.H.

http://www.ronpaulw arroom.com/ ?p=655 

http://www.ronpaulw arroom.com/ ?p=681
http://www.truthnew s.us/?p=1587

 

By admin | January 8, 2008

Kurt Nimmo
Truth News
January 8, 2008

According to a post this evening on the Ron Paul Forums, vote fraud occurred in Sutton, New Hampshire:

Sutton with 100% reporting reported 0 votes for paul but poster in Sutton posted:
My mom, aunt, and dad all voted for RP today in my hometown, My mom and aunt both work passing out ballots, and checking them off. I just looked at the politico map and it says their town has ZERO votes for Ron. Now i know that there isn’t corruption on voting in that little town, so where they reported it must be. What do I do, anyone know???

Originally Posted by sstjean View Post
This was posted to ronpaul-801 tonight: “This town numbers are wrong wrong wrong on this map. I am from Sutton originally and my parents and one aunt all voted for Ron Paul today and Sutton says 0. So this is wrong. This is a town that had 20 people counting the ballots and I have no reason to believe that they cheated. Small town and I was born and raised there. The real numbers will come in by morning. The electronic machines in the big towns are the ones we have to worry about.”

Earlier in the day, Brad Blog reported other suspicious behavior:

Our Spidey-sense started tingling before going to bed last night and hearing reports, on MSNBC, that there were 17 paper ballots cast in Dixville Notch, NH’s midnight, first-in-the- country voting. The report said that there were only 16 registered voters in the tiny voting precinct, yet 17 votes had been cast — suggesting that somehow, paper ballot “voter fraud” skullduggery was afoot.

Brad, however, believes the story is easily debunked:

Given that one of those reports seems to have begun on The DRUDGE REPORT earlier today, we’re not particularly surprised that the MSM kept repeating the easily-debunked stories running all day.

That, even while there are reasons to be concerned about how the paper ballots used in the New Hampshire Primary will actually be counted by the hackable Diebold optical-scan systems used in the state, as controlled and programmed by an outrageously bad private contractor there.

Of course, there is plenty of room for hank-panky, as Michael Collins notes:

81% of New Hampshire ballots are counted in secret by a private corporation named Diebold Election Systems (now known as “Premier”). The elections run on these machines are programmed by one company, LHS Associates, based in Methuen, MA. We know nothing about the people programming these machines, and we know even less about LHS Associates. We know even less about the secret vote counting software used to tabulate 81% of our ballots. People like to say “but we use paper ballots! They can always be counted by hand!”

But they’re not. They’re counted by Diebold. Only a candidate can request a hand recount, and most never do so. And a rigged election can easily become a rigged recount, as we learned in Ohio 2004, where two election officials were convicted of rigging their recount….

In short, the stage was set by Diebold and Republican operatives to rig yet another election, as the above first-hand account seems to indicate.

----------- ---------

If any of these Urls do not open, use copy and paste into the address bar.

------------ -------

 

hacking democracy”

http://www.youtube. com/results? search_query= hacking+democrac y&search=Search  

 

Hacking Democracy 1 of 9

http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=GzPXer7946E  

 

Hacking Democracy 2 of 9

http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=Eopnvw7mh_ 8&feature=related  

 

Hacking Democracy 3 of 9

http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=lxGSXYUkplA&feature=related  

 

Hacking Democracy 4 of 9

http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=JJ9UuXF1hkA&feature=related  

 

Hacking Democracy 5 of 9

http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=ht7fqoGUfS0&feature=related  

 

Hacking Democracy 6 of 9

http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=-3zp80H3pN0&feature=related  

 

Hacking Democracy 7 of 9

http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=0VoEVvR60Sg&feature=related  

 

Hacking Democracy 8 of 9

http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=iSvhnXtogQ4&feature=related  

 

Hacking Democracy 9 of 9

http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=J36Jfkxd1vA&feature=related  

 

Diebold Demands HBO Cancel Film Hacking Democracy (Alex Jones report)

http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=okCdo87cv0o  

 

http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=gBO8Bpv2ySg  

Anyone can be Hacking Democracy in Florida Part 1

 

Anyone can be Hacking Democracy in Florida Part 2

http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=FSOdthPoOeo  

 

http://www.shadowvo te.org/  

 

HBO's Hacking Democracy Promo

http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=R7bkHPqSQX0  

 

Hacking Democracy

http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=3k-xL15jFzM  

 

Got Vote?

http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=qGE_CmX8GuI  

 

changing the ROMs of a Nedap e-voting computer in 60 seconds

http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=EowKalRT3lc  

Ron Paul Votes Not Counted In New Hampshire District

http://www.prisonpl anet.com/ articles/ january2008/ 010908_not_ counted.htm 

New Hampshire District Admits Ron Paul Votes Not Counted
Sutton township reported Congressman had zero votes, actual number was 31

http://www.prisonpl anet.com/ articles/ january2008/ 010908_district_ admits.htm

Where Paper Prevailed, Different Results

http://www.legitgov .org/nh_machine_ vs_paper. html

99 Ways to Steal Elections: The Story of John Fund and Ron Paul http://howtheneocon sstolefreedom. blogspot. com/2008/ 01/99-ways- to-steal- elections- story-of. html

Here are a is an amazing site that shows proof of fraud...

http://www.bbvforum s.org/cgi- bin/forums/ discus.cgi




Informant: John Perna

.


__,_._,___